Cookies help us to understand how you use our website so that we can provide you with the best experience when you are on our site. To find out more, read our privacy policy and cookie policy.
A cookie is information stored on your computer by a website you visit. Cookies often store your settings for a website, such as your preferred language or location. This allows the site to present you with information customized to fit your needs. As per the GDPR law, companies need to get your explicit approval to collect your data. Some of these cookies are ‘strictly necessary’ to provide the basic functions of the website and can not be turned off, while others if present, have the option of being turned off. Learn more about our Privacy and Cookie policies. These can be managed also from our cookie policy page.
Consultation has concluded
Everyone is a custodian of the IAP2 brand
Recommendation 1
International role is to protect the brand with appreciation and allowance for regional nuances. Regions are the shared custodians and support the integrity of the brand
Recommendation 2
International will work with regions to evolvethe IAP2 narrative and brand. This will include:
Recommendation 3
Coordinate international and regional efforts to ensure an organized and seamless brand experience (timing, content, brand, website etc)
In my experience a brand is defined and built by how people perceive the organization. Is that how brand is being defined in this case? If not, what is the brand definition and how was it arrived at? BTW, this graphic is awesome!
Disappointed there is nothing here about the financial responsibilities of using the brand
You've got like it and love it around a different way here. My vote here is for like it